<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Adwords at the bottom of the SERPS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brianchappell.com/google-adwords-bottom-serps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brianchappell.com/google-adwords-bottom-serps/</link>
	<description>Search and Social Media Optimization - Link Development - Website Monetization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Lander</title>
		<link>http://www.brianchappell.com/google-adwords-bottom-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Lander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 01:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianchappell.com/google-adwords-bottom-serps/#comment-822</guid>
		<description>Whether this is a repeated test from 2005 or not, the fact is that it&#039;s happening now.  As Brian and I discussed via Twitter DM last night, there&#039;s probably something to the fact that these tests began (for him) in a very late scenario on a Friday.

As Tim Dineed rightly points out, Google&#039;s serving up zillions of search results.  I don&#039;t think inventory is ever an issue.  Monetization though always is with the hungry SOBs on Wall Street and in Board Rooms ruining the culture of the company.

But I digress.

The testing of this coincides with AdCenter changing up their tests and ad formats too. Nothing more than a coincidence - but maybe there&#039;s some push to get advertisers acclimated to new spots before the holiday season approaches and ad revenues soar through the roof?

Just a thought for discussion.

Either way, this is an excellent find and a very smooth screencast. Thanks for your work in putting this together Brian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether this is a repeated test from 2005 or not, the fact is that it&#8217;s happening now.  As Brian and I discussed via Twitter DM last night, there&#8217;s probably something to the fact that these tests began (for him) in a very late scenario on a Friday.</p>
<p>As Tim Dineed rightly points out, Google&#8217;s serving up zillions of search results.  I don&#8217;t think inventory is ever an issue.  Monetization though always is with the hungry SOBs on Wall Street and in Board Rooms ruining the culture of the company.</p>
<p>But I digress.</p>
<p>The testing of this coincides with AdCenter changing up their tests and ad formats too. Nothing more than a coincidence &#8211; but maybe there&#8217;s some push to get advertisers acclimated to new spots before the holiday season approaches and ad revenues soar through the roof?</p>
<p>Just a thought for discussion.</p>
<p>Either way, this is an excellent find and a very smooth screencast. Thanks for your work in putting this together Brian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Chappell</title>
		<link>http://www.brianchappell.com/google-adwords-bottom-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Chappell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 04:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianchappell.com/google-adwords-bottom-serps/#comment-817</guid>
		<description>@Jon

How long tell they plop these things in the middle of the page as well, along side the news, blog articles and images ;)

Leaving a couple spots to potentially rank organically.

@Tim

My pleasure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jon</p>
<p>How long tell they plop these things in the middle of the page as well, along side the news, blog articles and images <img src='http://www.brianchappell.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Leaving a couple spots to potentially rank organically.</p>
<p>@Tim</p>
<p>My pleasure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Dineen</title>
		<link>http://www.brianchappell.com/google-adwords-bottom-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Dineen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 04:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianchappell.com/google-adwords-bottom-serps/#comment-816</guid>
		<description>@Jon - not enough searches? Umm, they have like 70% market share of the zillion searches that occur each month. 

It&#039;s really about monetization and it&#039;s smart. If someone gets past result #10 and still hasn&#039;t found what they were looking for they may be likely to click an advertisement even if (or especially if) they weren&#039;t likely to do so at the top of the page.

Brian - nice smooth screencast! Thanks for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jon &#8211; not enough searches? Umm, they have like 70% market share of the zillion searches that occur each month. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s really about monetization and it&#8217;s smart. If someone gets past result #10 and still hasn&#8217;t found what they were looking for they may be likely to click an advertisement even if (or especially if) they weren&#8217;t likely to do so at the top of the page.</p>
<p>Brian &#8211; nice smooth screencast! Thanks for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Henshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.brianchappell.com/google-adwords-bottom-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 04:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianchappell.com/google-adwords-bottom-serps/#comment-815</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking too much inventory, not enough searches.

In additional to more ads, they could try throwing in some more universal search results â€“ a little video, maps, and a few other things â€“ then MSN/Live will actually start to look like a good and usable search engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking too much inventory, not enough searches.</p>
<p>In additional to more ads, they could try throwing in some more universal search results â€“ a little video, maps, and a few other things â€“ then MSN/Live will actually start to look like a good and usable search engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
